![]() ![]() There are legitimate questions about some passages, whether or not they are a part of the original text. I don't want to digress too far, but let's look at the issue of textual problems for just a minute. It is also true that the King James Version contains some textual errors. Large portions of the Book of Mormon are very similar to the King James Version of the Bible, which of course was about the only English Bible available to Joseph Smith in the 1820's. It is in fact replete with such errors, as I intend to show in these two "Part 6" posts to E-D. If this is true, then theīook of Mormon should be full of errors. It is either of divine or human origin, and if it is of human origin that means that Joseph Smith concocted the Book. There are two possible explanations for the origin of theīook of Mormon. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |